Tag:

Book Review

By Prakhar Tripathi

Literature has always been one of the driving forces behind a nation’s cultural development. With the advent of high speed internet and bunch of social media apps, literature has taken a back seat in the pop culture today, although the new generation English literature has created a niche for itself in the market. I am afraid that is not the situation with Hindi literature. If I were to draw an analogy then you could think of Hindi literature as ORKUT, it’s just the older generation which knows about it.

Since people are not paying much attention to Hindi literature now a days, it’s difficult to imagine that they would remember its history and how beautifully it has represented the contemporary Indian society. Women have always been a big part of the Hindi literature writers club. Men may have sometimes failed to depict the stark reality of society in their work but women have never failed to bring down the society as it is and question it in their work.

Chronologically, Hindi literature in independent India can be divided in three parts, first is the period of 1947 to 1968 in which literature was influenced by the partition, communal riots etc. The second period is the period of 1968 to 1990 which was influenced by the various caste based discrimination in the country prevalent at that time and the third period is after 1990 which can be called as new generation period after which it has been on a decline. All these three periods have given great Hindi female writers who have in their own way questioned the predominant social norms through their work.

The first period gives us writers like Krishna Sobti, Mahadevi Verma and Shivani. In their own ways they depicted the culture of India prevalent at that time. Krishna Sobti wrote ‘Mitro Marjani ‘ in 1967 which is considered a book way before its time. This book very well depicts how a woman who is bound by the shackles of patriarchy explores her sexuality. In fact there is a scene in Mitro Marjni in which Mitro, the daughter-in-law of the house is sitting on the door of the house and is laughing loudly. Suddenly her mother in law comes and rebukes her for laughing so loudly since she is the daughter-in-law, so she has to maintain the maryada of the house. With this book Krishna Sobti asks that if marriage is a bond between two people , then why is it only the woman who has to strictly abide by these bonds, why do men have all the freedom, why is it the woman who has to carry the burden of maryada of her house.

Then comes the very famous Mahadevi Verma, who had been active way before independence and who was bestowed with several of the prizes by the Indian government. She had her own share of struggle. She was subjected to child marriage and later her husband refused to live with her because he deemed her too ugly for him. Now all of these evils which women have to go through are very much depicted in her work. Her poem Mai Neer Bhare Dukh Ki Badali depicts the inner emotion of a woman who is made to live in a patriarchal society and all doors for her freedom are closed. She even went on to say Vivah Hamare Samaj Ki Sabhayata aur Asabhyata ka Pratik hai. (Marriage is the most civilized and uncivilized thing in our society) and that the institution needed major reforms.

Contemporary of Mahadevi Verma was Gaura Pant a.k.a Shivani, who again through her stories depicted how difficult the lives of women were. Born in a Kumaoni family, her story mostly revolved around Himalayas. Her book CHAUDH PHERE depicts how men try to assert their rights over women and take all the decisions for them. Laal Haveli is another of Shivani’s creation which through various short stories depict how it is always the women who has to sacrifice her wishes for men. Even before modern feminism touched India, she was already propagating the idea of it through her work.

Manu Bhandari a writer of later years wrote famous books like Aapka Bunty and Mahabhoj . Aapka Bunty (1971) tells the story of a separated couple. In one particular scene, when the husband comes to meet his son and sees him playing ludo and carrom board games, he asks him to stop playing these feminine games and play games which are more masculine. This is how she addressed the prevalent sexism in the society at that point of time. She also was prominent supporter of Indian independence movement and wrote many books supporting the same.
Apart from them no one can forget the very famous Amrita Pritam who established milestones both in Hindi and Punjabi.

The period of 1968 to 1990 saw writers like Mrinal Pande and few others who thrived to keep the burning fire of female Hindi writers alive. This period also saw lots of dalit female writers taking up writing in their own regional languages, to voice their opinion. Later their work was also translated in in Hindi and other languages. Writers like Shantabai Kamble (Majhya Jalmachi/The Kaleidoscopic Story of my life), Urmila Pawar (Aaidan/Weave of my Life) and Babytai Kamble (Jina Amuche/Prisons we broke) are some of them.

The period post 1990 was the globalization period, people drifted towards the west, and in a way Hindi literature was lost somewhere. Still some writers have made their mark in this period also like Baby Haldar and Indira Dangi. Baby Haldar’s story is extremely inspiring. She was a house help, after which she got her hands on a book in one of the houses she worked in and eventually she started reading. In 2006 she wrote the masterpiece Aalo Aandhari which has been translated into 21 languages.

We need to acknowledge the work of these and many more female writers, who have always stood up against the preconceived ideas of society, the patriarchal system and produced some of the finest works of Indian literature. If we start doing it, then I think it would pave the way for more such female writers to come up and bring out the evils of social system (which still do exist) and help our society grow as a whole.

0 comments 37 views
3 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

By Rishi Thakur

“Photograph”, a low budget 2019 Hindi movie, high on content is a cinematographic delight for those seeking true meaning of love and truth in life. The protagonist of the movie is a struggling street photographer (played by Nawazuddin Siddiqui) who mails a stranger’s picture (which he took at the Gateway of India in Mumbai) to his grandmother hoping that she will stop pestering him for marriage. He fails to anticipate that his grandmother will insist on meeting the girl in photograph – Miloni (played by Sanya Malhotra). Caught in this strange situation, he tries his luck (or he was in love) and finds Miloni (may be far-fetched to believe that he found a stranger without any details in a city like Mumbai) to convince her to meet his grandmother. While the character played by Nawaz – Rafi, must have required a lot of in-depth research but I am more in love with the character of ‘Miloni’ for many reasons.

For the uninitiated, Miloni is a girl who grew up in a Bengali family settled in Mumbai. Like any other middle class family of India, she was comfortably (as a matter of parents inherent right to decide their children’s future) asked to quit her dream of becoming an actor and instead focus on her studies. She complied. She was offered every comfort to forget her dream. She accepted. She did everything asked by her parents without any protest, which also included meeting a stranger guy for arrange marriage. She rarely smiled. No one bothered. This shy and coy character who never stood up for her dream or her life accepted with ease a strange offer of Rafi to meet his grandmother posing as his girlfriend.

One way to look at Miloni’s character is a girl finding solace in an innocent but adventurous proposal of Rafi. Another way of interpreting this can be that she was trying to live her own dream to be an actor by acting as Rafi’s girlfriend or a third possible interpretation is that she was tired of acting as a good and abiding girl of her parents and wanted to live a true life where she was not told what to do. One may argue that Miloni was suffocated in her own home and found freedom in the adventure offered by Rafi, who was from a different religion, background and nowhere comparable to her social status.

But then there may be a deeper interpretation of Miloni’s character. I believe that only a heart which is in love can agree to a proposal which may look suspicious in a world which has forgotten meaning of love and faith. A heart that lacks love will be either scared to accept such a request or will treat it as a lustful proposal. Lust is for the weak – love is for the brave. Miloni’s willingness to co-operate with Rafi expresses her brave and loveable character. Three things that stands out for me.

First, love expresses itself in silence. Brahma Sutra (a treatise written by Badrayan) proposes that spirituality (essentially love) can be expressed only by silence or poetry. What does that mean? To my understanding, Brahma Sutra suggests that love loses its meaning (basically innocence for the lack of a better word) when expressed in words. Miloni expresses herself rarely and speaks not more than 10-15 lines in the entire movie. Her silence expresses her love beautifully. Secondly, her faith. She had faith on Rafi’s intention. She accepted his proposal without much enquiry.

Our scriptures suggest that faith is what defines love. Love can exist only where there is faith (I am not talking about trust. Trust can be broken not faith). So, this character teaches us that to be in love is to have unflinching faith in nature (not in faith in one person- which we have been taught by our society). The fact that nature is never unfair- is the basis of faith in it.

Lastly, she helped Rafi without any expectation or hope. Love is all about giving. A heart in love is in love with everything and everyone. It does not pick and choose. To pick and choose is, to my mind, planning and not love. A heart which is full of love is always happy – it has one option only which is to make others happy.

Well, you may have a different way to look at ‘The Photograph’ – but that is the beauty of a good movie, one can walk away with any of the various interpretations.

But the immense possibilities and layers in Miloni’s character makes this movie a must watch. It also presents a struggle that is very familiar to girls in India – how to live one’s own life and arrive on one’s own. And for that alone it makes for a great movie.

#moviereview #movies2019 #photograph #NawazuddinSiddiqui #sanyamalhotra  

0 comments 18 views
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Author – Margaret Atwood

Originally Published – 1985

By Haritima Kavia

Écriture féminine, or “feminine writing”, a term coined by Hélène Cixous in 1976, challenges phallocentric language and bravely puts forth the notion that feminist writings are better developed by female writing by the virtue of perspective. Such a convincing, direct and artless perspective is provided by Margaret Atwood through the protagonist of The Handmaid’s Tale, Offred, a woman living a life of total subservience, stripped of her identity and rights, in the fictional totalitarian regime of Gilead. A strange moral tale that transcends time is an exemplary model of “speculative dystopian fiction”, Atwood’s métier, which wraps you up in a sinister world that seems just within sight. 

It must be noted, before moving further, that Atwood penned this story as she witnessed radical socio-political changes around her. Gripped by anti-nuclear protests, backlashes against the Second Wave of Feminism, the advent of a conservative party in the Congress and growing strength of right-wing Christian groups, battle lines were drawn all across the map of USA. The dystopia was nothing but an inch-perfect rendition created out of the concerns that dwell deep in Atwood’s consciousness. Such clashes ring true in today’s world as well, ergo, unavoidable parallels can still be drawn between the real world and the world of Offred. 

The female persecution and marginalization is a recurring motif in the work, making it impossible to not apply a feminist critique to it. Atwood sparks dialogue about the representation of women, the patriarchal assumptions to female freedom, gender stereotypes and uncovering the message these same provide. 

Female Identity and Oppression 

“Sanity is a valuable possession; I hoard it the way people once hoarded money. I save it, so I will have enough, when the time comes.” 

The patriarchal tyranny in Gilead victimizes and oppresses women, pushing them to turn into lifeless bodies non compos mentis. The military regime of Gilead takes away a woman’s right to own property, earn, marry, bear children, education and abortion. The narrator and protagonist of the story, Offred, was captured and forcefully made a “Handmaid”, a name taken by the biblical story of Rachel and her handmaid Bilhah, who is supposed to rear children for high ranking officers or the “Commanders”. The absence of her identity is shown in the conception of her name itself, and amalgamation of the words “of” and “Fred”, the latter being the name of the Commander she was assigned to. Every handmaid is given names in the same manner by the State and the real name of the narrator is not disclosed to the readers. This absence of simple utterance of one’s own name shows how strictly women were monitored and expected to forget about their past identities. 

There was strict classification and ranking among women, which laid down the duties and freedom provided to each women, according to a dress code. Ranked lowest to highest, widows in black, young girls in white, the “Econowives” (domestic workers) in stripes, the Marthas (maids and cooks) in green, the Aunts (trainers for Handmaids) in brown, the Handmaids clad in red with white veils and the Commander’s wives in blue. They are recognized and treated by the State according to the color of their clothes, an important determinant of their identity. Moreover, sterile or old women, unmarried women, feminists, widows, lesbians, nuns, and rebels are sent away to “the Colonies” as they are deemed “Unwomen” or incapable of social cohesion by the State. This system not only replaces religious and racial segregation we see in the modern day that compartmentalizes people to fit certain roles against their wills but also is a near replica of the archaic form of slavery, unfortunately made a reality in the modern-day setting of the text. 

This oppression is also to the disadvantage of many poor, marginalized men. The State oppresses in two ways, by constant usage of a certain type of language that brainwashes them into following self-persecuting ideals, and by actions or violence, a harsher and direct way to subjugate. 

Reproductive Rights 

The re-population program of Gilead is backed by the literal interpretation and preaching of biblical text, enabling state-sanctioned rape and taking away abortion rights. Women in Gilead are merely seen as baby-making tools and their fertility allows the State to make surrogates mothers out of them. These children are then not allowed to be with Handmaid’s and are given away to the military-class couples. Pivotal to the whole process is a spine-chilling sexual act known as the “Ceremony”, that requires Offred to lie between the legs of Fred’s wife, as a symbol of a substitute womb, and copulate with the Commander in that position on the chosen days of her menstrual cycle.

Sexuality

“Modesty is invisibility…Never forget it. To be seen—to be seen—is to be…penetrated. What you must be girls, is impenetrable.”

Any citizen’s sexual orientation is not respected, valued or protected by Gilead. Women are required to be constantly covered or dressed “modestly” according to the State. It also starts a discourse on queer rights as we see Moira, a friend of Offred, being subjected to a heteronormative life. Heterosexuality is a default for the people of Gilead. 

Constant Surveillance and Repression of Freedom of Thought and Expression 

“Knowing was a temptation. What you don’t know won’t tempt you.”

“The eyes”, a secret police of Gilead that crushes dissent and enables public paranoia, constantly surveys the society and citizens. The eye is a hauntingly pervasive symbol that is also tattooed on every handmaid’s ankles so as to remind them they cannot escape the State. The protagonist is treated as “national resource” and her body is owned and monitored at all times. There is no privacy or freedom of thought and expression in the land of Gilead. Education is not accessible to women to prevent them from interpreting the Bible, used as a tool of subjugation, and from thinking about anything other than what the State requires them to. 

Gilead not a Far Cry

At a glance, Handmaid’s Tale may seem a remote reality that will never jump out of the pages to life. In many countries of the world, like Saudi Arabia, women are still denied basic human rights. Inhumane oppression still remains a reality in many countries like Syria. Constant surveillance and lack of freedom of thought and expression is the order of the day in countries like China. Women are legally denied rights to abortion in USA and perpetually expected to have babies by the society in India. Deeply embedded patriarchal norms enable state-sanctioned abuse and injustice to women, marginalized communities, non-binary genders, people of different sexual orientation, and many other groups pushed to the sidelines. The question is not how distant the world is from Gilead, instead it is how many of Gilead’s characteristics we have already adopted and put to work. 

If we take a closer look at India, almost every household has a phallocentric distribution of power. The government does not actively provide queer, women, or non-binary gender rights. The apparatus of democracy remains highly corrupt, inefficient and insensitive towards marginalized and oppressed communities. Targeted and influential political campaigns coupled with constant surveillance of the dissenters, whether online or real life, and their persecution is not unknown to our society. Religious fundamentalism has not only entered the belief systems of the uneducated and unaware, but also the educated class of the country. As the third wave of feminism and libertarian movement paves the way for socio-political changes in the society, we edge towards a counter-attack, like the one in 80s by Reagan, backed by a conservative government and religious fanatics. A poorly fashioned dummy of Gilead, perhaps capable of being spotted only in hindsight, is not a distant reality. 

Lack of exciting progression does not dampen the intensity of the plot, just like an unreliable narrator does not augment confusion or halt lucid storytelling. Not only will the words between these pages tell a tale like no other, Atwood brilliantly slows down and allows the reader’s mind to wander off with the protagonist and find meaning between the same lines. Gripping, poignant, haunting and thought provoking, The Handmaid’s Tale is more than just a book, it’s an education. We will hopefully always go back to this text to realize the need to question the system and remember, as Atwood put it, “Don’t let the bastards grind you down”.

0 comments 118 views
1 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
The Womb - Encouraging, Empowering and Celebrating Women.

The Womb is an e-platform to bring together a community of people who are passionate about women rights and gender justice. It hopes to create space for women issues in the media which are oft neglected and mostly negative. For our boys and girls to grow up in a world where everyone has equal opportunity irrespective of gender, it is important to create this space for women issues and women stories, to offset the patriarchal tilt in our mainstream media and society.

@2025 – The Womb. All Rights Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Womb Team

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?