Tag:

United States

By Arthita Banerjee

Haben, is a truly inspiring memoir of a remarkable woman who despite being born deaf and blind, refused to let her disabilities define her, and instead pursued a path of education and advocacy that culminated in her becoming the first deafblind person to graduate from Harvard Law School.

Throughout the book, Girma weaves together personal anecdotes with her reflections on disability, justice, and the power of community. One story that stands out is her description of an incident where she was excluded from a school field trip due to her disability. Girma recalls feeling frustrated and angry at the time, but it was this experience that inspired her to become an advocate for disability rights. “I remember feeling so left out and so excluded, and I realized that this was a problem that went far beyond just me,” she writes. “It was a problem with the way our society was structured, and I knew I wanted to do something to change that.”

As Girma pursued her education and career, she faced countless obstacles and challenges related to her disability. One of the most significant of these was navigating the legal system as a deafblind person. Girma describes the frustration of trying to access court documents and legal briefs that were not available in accessible formats, and the discrimination she faced from judges and lawyers who did not understand her needs. “I was constantly having to fight for my rights and advocate for myself,” she writes. “It was exhausting, but it also made me even more determined to use my education and my voice to make a difference.”

One of the most striking aspects of Girma’s writing is her ability to convey the sensory experiences of living as a deafblind person. She describes the way her other senses, such as touch and smell, have become heightened as a result of her disabilities, and the way she has learned to navigate the world using tools like tactile sign language and braille. These descriptions give readers a glimpse into a world that is often invisible and marginalized, and serve as a reminder of the importance of creating a more inclusive society. In interviews promoting the book, Girma has spoken about the power of community and the importance of finding allies who are willing to fight alongside you for justice and equality. She recounts an incident where a group of students at her high school learned sign language to communicate with her, a gesture that made a huge impact on her sense of belonging and connection. “It was such a simple thing, but it meant the world to me,” she says. “It showed me that people were willing to make an effort to include me, and that made all the difference.”

But what is perhaps most impressive is the way Girma turns her personal experiences into a call to action. She urges readers to think critically about the way our society is structured and to work towards creating a world that is more accessible and equitable for all. As she writes, “Disability is not just an individual problem. It is a societal problem, and it requires a societal response.”

Girma’s advocacy work has not gone unnoticed. In 2013, she was appointed to the White House Fellowship program, where she worked in the Office of Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs. During her time there, she worked on issues related to disability rights and inclusion, and she continued to advocate for these issues after leaving the fellowship.

Overall, Haben, is a powerful and inspiring memoir that offers readers a unique perspective on the challenges facing people with disabilities in our society. Girma’s writing is both easy-flowing and incisive, offering readers a clear and compelling narrative of her journey towards becoming a lawyer and advocate for disability rights. Through her story, Girma reminds us of the importance of resilience, determination, and community in the face of adversity. One can’t help but feel a sense of admiration and respect for Haben Girma and her unwavering commitment to justice and equity for all. Her story is a testament to the power of perseverance and the potential for individuals to create real change in the world.

3 comments 26 views
2 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

By Arthita Banerjee

In the mid-1960s, Malcolm X once remarked, “If you stick a knife nine inches into my back and pull it out three inches, that is not progress. Even if you pull it all the way out, that is not progress. Progress is healing the wound, and America hasn’t even begun to pull out the knife.” Unfortunately, to this day his words are just as salient and prophetic as they were during the Civil Rights Era. Race, discrimination, and power are the holy trinity that have shaped the American Criminal Justice System. The 13thamendment to the United States Constitution passed in the year 1865 forever abolished slavery as an institution making it clear that “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction”. The declaration had a highly exploitable loophole one which whoever came to power, irrelevant of political leanings, always capitalized on.

A cinematic tour de force.

Ava DuVerney, the trail-blazing African-American director made the film 13th, named after the amendment making a very strong case for mass incarceration being an extension of slavery. The 2016 film which opened at the New York Film Festival earned a Best Documentary Feature nomination, making DuVernay the first African-American female director in history to score an Oscar nod in a feature category. The brilliance of DuVernay’s film is how well it maps out the myriad ways in which that very loophole has been exploited throughout time. The process not only destroyed untold lives but effectively transferred the guilt for slavery from the people who perpetuated it to the very people who suffered through it.

With an all-encompassing ethos, logos and pathos technique the film uses hard logic for rational inquiry, narrative and visual poetics to elicit emotional responses, and ample amount of rhetoric to build consensus on debated issues. 13th covers a lot of ground, all in a relatively chronological manner. The film begins by investigating how the abolition of slavery devastated the southern economy, the lynchings in the deep south, the Jim Crow laws, Nixon’s presidential campaign, Reagan’s War on Drugs, Bill Clinton’s Three Strikes and mandatory sentencing laws and the current cash-for-prisoners model that generates millions for private bail and incarceration firms.

We learn that although the U.S. is home to only 5% of the world’s population, it houses an astounding 25% of its prisoners and with black men making up barely 6.5% of the US population, they made up to 40.2% of the U.S. prison population. The graphic tally of the number of prisoners in the system is relatively stable through the 1940s but records a meteoric rise during the Civil Rights movement and the exponential growth continues into the current day. The quantitative data and the statistics used in the film reinforce the hypothesis of the prison-industrial complex being a cesspool for vested corporate interests using the system as a front to carry out modern day slavery.

Reality denied comes back to haunt.

D.W. Griffith’s landmark film, The Birth of a Nation, originally called the Clansman was a work of pro-confederacy, repugnant propaganda but unquestionably a very original work of art. At the time, most viewers knew little about slavery, reconstruction, Jim Crow and almost nothing about the Klan, and were all too ready to swallow the very worst of the movie without question. Birth of a Nation depicted lynchings in a positive light. No wonder the then sitting President, Woodrow Wilson, after watching the film, remarked that it had ‘History written with lightning’. DuVernay relies on plenty of clips from Griffith’s film along with photos and videos from the Jim Crow years as a reference point to show beyond doubt how African Americans have continually been portrayed as criminals in many forms of American media. Dr. King’s voice in the background of the montage of the clips, is especially haunting, as he says, “For years now, I have heard the word ‘wait.’ It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing familiarity. This wait has almost always meant never…justice too long delayed is justice denied.”

What’s happened to the American dream? It came true. You’re lookin’ at it.

The film also investigates the vested interest of countless corporations who have prisoners work for them without pay as part of their sentencing. The arrangement has been facilitated by politicians who have implemented policies that feed off of the same media-generated terror of black criminals. The American Legislative Exchange Council, better known as ALEC, a coalition of corporate interests like Walmart and Verizon, introduces federal policies which arguably result in putting immigrants along with African Americans behind bars. The alliance then profits from the success of private prisons, surveillance, and prison labor. The film informs us how one in every four US legislators have ties to ALEC and DuVernay shows us NEWS clips where legislators have introduced bills and policies without even bothering to remove ALEC’s branding from them. The racial underpinnings of legislative policy and the active role of the state in criminalising and undermining the people of colour is more evident than it ever was.

DuVernay not only interviews liberal scholars and activists for the cause like Angela Davis, Van Jones and Henry Louis Gates, she also devotes screen time to conservatives and dissenting points of views such as Newt Gingrich, Grover Norquist and Michael Hough, a Republican politician and member of ALEC. To the credit of the filmmaker, neither Norquist nor Gingrich come across as if they were brought in simply to show evidence of inclusion and a way of giving some semblance of an argument from the other side of the aisle.

Having this diverse range of voices, makes the film more engaging and adds a level of complexity and a layer of credibility to the narrative. Each interviewee is shot in a location with low lighting that evokes an industrial setting and a low constant note plays in the backdrop that creates an ominous feeling. The aesthetics visually support the theme of prison as a factory, churning out free labor, that the 13th Amendment supposedly dismantled when it abolished slavery.

A good song reminds us what we’re fighting for.

The uniquely compelling use of powerful songs in the film by black artists appear as arresting animations that highlight politically-charged lyrics, like Public Enemy’s “Don’t Believe the Hype” and Nina Simone’s version of “Work Song”. The method is used primarily to transition between segments in the film and also reiterates its main theme. The song “Reagan” by Killer Mike is used to transition between Richard Nixon’s “tough on crime” and “law and order” period to Ronald Reagan’s “war on drugs”. The creative integration of rap and hip-hop songs in the film is significant to its theme because rap music has been historically used to portray the struggles of the African American people’s plight in America.

You can’t hold a man down without staying down with him.

We learn that the Nixon administration had two enemies, the blacks and the anti-war hippies of the left. The 1968 campaign ‘tough on crime’ was aimed at criminalizing both the groups with ‘specific drugs’ that are associated with them. DuVernay plays an astonishing recorded testimony from John Ehrlichman, the Assistant to the President for Domestic Affairs, in which he admits that the government created a crackdown that targeted left-wing dissidents…and black people. But always with the excuse of fighting the drug scourge. “Did we know we were lying about the drugs?” asks Ehrlichman. “Of course we did.” He goes on to say ‘You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

The film briefly touches on Ronald Raegan‘s Southern Strategy and Bill Cinton’s policies on how he incentivized states to adopt truth-in-sentencing laws, which required prisoners to serve at least 85 percent of their sentence. Clinton was also responsible for the Federal Three-Strikes Law that doled out life sentences to repeat offenders. On top of the Reagan-era mandatory minimum sentencing for drug crimes, these added up to more people, disproportionately people of color, in prison for longer periods of time. Democrat Bill Clinton arguably did the most damage in giving birth to the current prison industrial complex.

We also learn how awarding higher sentences are the norm for crack vs. cocaine possession and how plea bargains are accepted by innocent people too terrified to go to trial. A troubling percentage of people remain in jail because they’re too poor to post their own bail.

A spark that started a prairie fire.

The film’s most important voice belongs to Kalief Browder, a Black Bronx teen who spent three horrific years in jail, despite not being convicted of a crime. He had been arrested in the spring of 2010, aged 16 and was subsequently detained on Rikers Island without any conviction for more than 1,000 days. After being released, he committed suicide two years later as a result of the mental, sexual and physical abuse he endured in prison.

The film works its way to the current days of Black Lives Matter. DuVernay uses images from the past and juxtaposes them against contemporary rhetoric. We see clips of Hillary Clinton talking about “super-predators” and the voice of Donald Trump, romantically talking about ‘the good old days’ playing over footage of the KKK burning crosses, an image that was itself inspired by Griffith’s immensely racist film. It also touches upon Trump’s full-page ad advocating the death penalty for the Central Park Five, who, as a reminder, were all innocent. There is a montage sequence depicting the deaths of Philando Castile, Tamir Rice, Eric Garner and others. One clip that particularly stands out is the video of Philando Castile in his car after he has been shot by a police officer. Bloodied and in pain, he breathes quietly as his girlfriend records the situation, explains that they were pulled over for a simple broken tail light, and says to Philando, “Stay with me.” This section ends with a list of countless more black individuals who have unjustly died at the hands of police officers. 13th successfully argues that such events have not only become rampant, but can also seem sadly like ‘business as usual’.

Living is easy with eyes closed.

One of the major themes presented throughout the film is how unaware most Americans are of the larger racialized dynamics that were used to negatively impact vulnerable black communities — whether it was the re-enslaving of black people throughout the reconstruction period, using the war on drugs to specifically target black folks, or now using the American Legislative Exchange Council to fund private prisons dependent on black bodies for income. DuVernay was quoted as saying, ‘We’re giving you 150 years of oppression in 100 minutes. The film was 150 years in the making’. It indeed, very eloquently exemplifies how documentaries can be influential for enacting social change and it is through open dialogue and awareness that a demand for justice and reform can occur.

While the themes which the film addresses have long been relevant, they may have a particular relevance today, with the current conversation surrounding issues of police brutality and modern-day racism. The November 20th verdict of Kyle Rittenhouse who was found not guilty in the Kenosha Shootingsand completely acquitted of all charges including intentional homicide and 4 other counts, by an almost completely white jury, “sends the unacceptable message that armed civilians can show up in any town, incite violence, and then use the danger they have created to justify shooting people in the street” DuVerney tweeted.

A lot of Indians also voiced their support for the global Black Lives Matter Movement but putting things into perspective, Racism and colourism are very much a part of everyday discourse in an average Indian household. The discrimination based on skin color is partly a colonial hang-up and the idea that fair skin is superior has been thoroughly internalized by society. With no moral obligations, the idea of fair skin being equal to beauty is promoted among young men and women and as of 2019, the Indian fairness cream industry was worth $450 million.

Notably, these prejudices are not only limited to the colour of your skin but extend to the faith you practice and even the Caste you belong to. The fault lines between the majoritarian Hindus and the Muslim minority have become much worse with a Hindu nationalist government at the helm. No such activist film will ever see the light of the day in the Indian subcontinent with an ever repressive film censorship regime.

Won’t you celebrate with me?

13th is inspiring as it is wrenching to watch. With the use of didacticism in storytelling, the narrative presented in the story seeks to re-educate and eradicate the collective amnesia of American society. The film ends with images of “black joy,” as DuVernay put it — “photographs of black people and families celebrating and living their lives”. It’s a purposeful choice, and a humanizing one. “Black trauma is not our life,” DuVernay explained. “We are survivors.” Perhaps the most sobering quote of the entire film is delivered at the end by lawyer and activist Bryan Stevenson. “People say all the time, ‘well, I don’t understand how people could have tolerated slavery?’ ‘How could they have made peace with that?’ ‘How could people have gone to a lynching and participated in that?’ ‘That’s so crazy, if I was living at that time I would never have tolerated anything like that.’ And the truth is we are living in this time, and we are tolerating it.”

0 comments 28 views
10 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

The Afghan War

by Guest Author

Pooja Bhattacharjee

Formed in 1994, the Taliban were made up of former Afghan resistance fighters, known collectively as mujahedeen, who fought the invading Soviet forces in the 1980s. They aimed to impose their interpretation of Islamic law on the country and remove any foreign influence. After the Taliban captured Kabul in 1996, the Sunni Islamist organization put in place strict rules where women had to wear head-to-toe coverings, weren’t allowed to study or work, and were forbidden from traveling alone. TV, music, and non-Islamic holidays were also banned.  Though the Taliban remained on the other side of the fence during the US presence in Afghanistan, they quickly invaded all the major Afghan cities at the offset of the US military. 

It’s been over a month since the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan. With half a million people displaced since the withdrawal of the coalition military, millions of people fleeing the country at the onset of the Taliban rule, a collapsing economy and raging unemployment, a possible internet shut down, and major humanitarian crisis at the hands of the interim government composed of terrorists and extremists, stability in Afghanistan is still a far-fetched dream. 

An Uncertain Future For Afghan Women 

Women and children are increasingly bearing the brunt of the violence and continue to be at risk of targeted attacks. Afghan women makeup around half of all civilian casualties. Afghanistan has been the deadliest place for children for the past six years. The Taliban gets to control what women wear, how much they can study, put restrictions on women’s place of work and decide when women will get married. Women in Afghanistan face rising levels of domestic violence, abuse, and exploitation. Women fear to even leave their home under Taliban rule and are barred from leaving home without a male relative. 

Taliban spokesman Suhail Shaheen says the group will respect the rights of women and minorities ‘as per Afghan norms and Islamic values’.  Taliban officials have said women will be able to study and work in accordance with sharia law and local cultural traditions, but strict dress rules will apply. However, a few days ago, they said they would open schools for high school aged boys and male teachers but made no mention of the country’s millions of women educators and girl pupils. Many are questioning how much they would respect women’s rights after this incident.

Education

Over the past 20 years, progress has been made on the number of girls receiving an education in Afghanistan, but over the past few months attacks on schools and villages dramatically increased while international support has slowly withdrawn. It is feared that 1 million children will miss out on education. In July, a group of Afghan schoolgirls shared their fears with an online publication. “As the fighting increases day by day, it’s a concern that we’ll go back in time,” one 15 year old said. 

Amidst the conservative Taliban rule and restrictions on women’s education, Higher Education Minister Abdul Baqi Haqqani, in the Taliban interim government ordered gender segregation  and mandatory hijabs for women in colleges and universities. The plan mentions bisecting classrooms, cubicles with curtains fitted with jaalis, and separate shifts for women and men in schools and universities. For now, most universities have proposed that women be allowed to attend classes from behind curtains or cubicles, or transferred to institutes in provinces they come from. 

Nobel Peace Prize winner Malala Yousafzai, who was shot by a Taliban gunman in Pakistan for advocating for girl’s education, pleaded with the world leaders to not compromise on the protection of women’s rights and the protection of human dignity. In a panel on girl’s education in Afghanistan on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly, Malala emphasized on ensuring the rights of Afghan women are protected, including the right to education. 

Strict Dress Restrictions for Women

Recently, women holding a pro-Taliban rally in Kabul were seen saying Afghan women wearing make-up and in modern clothes “do not represent the Muslim Afghan woman” and “we don’t want women’s rights that are foreign and at odds with sharia” – referring to the strict version of Islamic law supported by the Taliban. These women were seen in black dresses that cover the entire body from top of the head to the ground. 

This was met with a lot of criticism from Afghan women globally, including Mursal Sayas, a master trainer at Afghanistan Human Rights Commission who responded to this incident with, “The fashion statement behind these clothes that cover even the women’s eyes is coercion, bullying and non-recognition of women’s choices and rights.” This was a mutual feeling with a lot of people. 

Afghan women have started a powerful online campaign to protest against the Taliban’s strict new dress code for female students and the burqa worn by women at the pro-Taliban rally. Using hashtags like #DoNotTouchMyClothes and #AfghanistanCulture, many are sharing pictures of their colourful traditional dresses. Women are also protesting about linking chadari or burqa to Afghan women. “Chadari came to Afghanistan during wars with Soviets at the hands of extremists. The main dress of Afghan women is a colorful long gown, with small mirrors and delicate thread work,” Attia Mehraban, a women’s rights activist in Afghanistan said. 

Women Afghan students wore all black during a pro-Taliban rally at a university in Kabul. 

Though there is no indication that the women attending the pro-Taliban rally were forced to wear that clothing nor has the Taliban said that this will become an enforced standard yet, apart from mandatory burqas for women in universities, but it’s just a matter of time till they control this aspect of women’s lives. Images of women on billboards and in shops around Kabul were covered up or vandalised within days of Taliban’s return to the capital. 

In Workplace

The Taliban had promised that its new era will be more moderate, but it has refused to guarantee women’s rights will not be stripped back and many have already faced violence. Last month, Taliban spokesperson Zabiullah Mujahid said at a news conference that women should not go to work for their own safety. He added that the Taliban ‘keep changing and are not trained to respect women.’ A senior figure in the Taliban, Waheedullah Hashimi said that Afghan women and men should not be allowed to work together as Sharia law doesn’t allow it. If formally implemented, it would bar women from employment in government offices, banks, media companies, etc. 

At the onset of Taliban rule last month, girls in Kandahar were asked to go home and their male relatives were asked to fill in their positions in the bank. Many other women have been stripped off of their positions at work and their male relatives have been asked to fill in their positions. Taliban officials have held that women will be allowed to work only when proper segregation can be implemented. Many Afghan women fear that they would never find meaningful employment. 

Taliban has also shut down the former government’s Ministry of Women’s Affairs and replaced it with one which enforces religious doctrine. Although still marginalized, Afghan women have fought for and gained basic rights in the past 20 years, becoming lawmakers, judges, pilots, though mostly limited to large cities. But since returning to power, the Taliban have shown no inclination to honor those rights.

Activist Pashtana Durrani warns people to be wary of the promises made by Taliban;

“You have to understand that what the Taliban say and what they are putting in practice are two different things, they are looking for legitimacy from all these different countries, to be accepted as the legitimate government of Afghanistan, but then at the same time, what are they doing in practice?” Ms. Durrani also points out that when the Taliban talk about women’s rights, they talk about them in vague terms: do they mean mobility rights, socialising rights, political rights, their representative rights and/or voting rights? It is not clear whether they mean all or only some of those rights, she says.

Grey clouds cover the Afghanistan sky, the darkness and gloominess represents the country’s future under Taliban rule. Many are worried that their hopes and dreams will be shattered by the Taliban, many have been stripped off their basic rights to freedom & education, the most affected remain the women. They have been banned from working in many major sectors by the Taliban, they cannot be a member of the cabinet and uncertainty hovers over their future and their right to livelihood. There is a state of anxiousness and Afghan women and girls must wait to see what pans out in the course of time.         

0 comments 24 views
7 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

By Arthita Banerjee

In the wake of the chaos unleashed by the infamous Senate 8 Bill it is important to take a look at ground zero, the fabled Roe v Wade. The broad idea held by the people is the US and the world at large is that Roe was instrumental in ‘legalising abortion’ in Texas, however the truth might be far from it. What it essentially did was determine the way states can regulate abortion.

For those not in the know, Jane Roe, was an unmarried pregnant woman who had filed a lawsuit on behalf of herself and others challenging the Texas abortion law. She was joined by her doctor who at the time claimed that the State’s abortion laws were too vague for even the medical practioners to follow. Roe argued absolute Privacy Rights for all women claiming the Texan law infringed on women’s rights to marital, familial and sexual privacy guaranteed by the Bill of rights. It also invaded an individual’s right to liberty guaranteed by the 14th amendment. The State, of course, argued that ‘fetus’ is a person protected by the 14th amendment and it is absolutely necessary for it to protect prenatal life from the time of its conception.

It might be important to understand here that the US Constitution doesn’t provide a definition of a ‘person’. It does say that the United States protection covers those who are born or naturalized in the Country. The Roe v Wade judgement went on to state that “the ‘unborn’ had never been recognized in law as persons in the whole sense”. The prevailing idea that life begins at conception draws from the Catholic faith rather than science. The medical community leans toward the belief that life begins sometime before birth. It is essentially a religious viewpoint that has stockpiled a whole lot of cultural clout.

The legendary Ruth Bader Ginsburg, said that she believed it would have been easier for the public to understand why the Constitution protected abortion rights if the matter had been framed as one of equal protection rather than privacy. During her time as a lawyer for the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) she fought for Struck in the matter of Struck v. Secretary of Defense.

Susan Struck, an Air Force Captain got pregnant while serving in Vietnam and sued the Air Force after it said she would have to either get an abortion at the base hospital or leave if she wanted to have the child. She told the Air Force that she didn’t want to get an abortion instead give birth and then put the baby up for adoption because abortion violated her Roman Catholic faith. Ginsburg explained her approach to the Senate Judiciary Committee stating:

“First, that the applicable Air Force regulations — if you are pregnant you are out unless you have an abortion — violated the equal protection principle, for no man was ordered out of service because he had been the partner in a conception, no man was ordered out of service because he was about to become a father.

Next, we said that the Government is impeding, without cause, a woman’s choice whether to bear or not to bear a child. Birth was Captain Struck’s personal choice, and the interference with it was a violation of her liberty, her freedom to choose, guaranteed by the due process clause.

Finally, we said the Air Force was involved in an unnecessary interference with Captain Struck’s religious belief.”

So all three strands were involved in Captain Struck’s case. The main emphasis was on her equality as a woman vis-à-vis a man who was equally responsible for the conception, and on her personal choice, which the Government said she could not have unless she gave up her career in the service.

In that case, all three strands were involved: her equality right, her right to decide for herself whether she was going to bear the child, and her religious belief. So it was never an either/or matter, one rather than the other. It was always recognition that one thing that conspicuously distinguishes women from men is that only women become pregnant; and if you subject a woman to disadvantageous treatment on the basis of her pregnant status, which was what was happening to Captain Struck, you would be denying her equal treatment under the law.

It is interesting to note that the Supreme Court revisited Roe v. Wade in 1992 when reviewing Planned Parenthood v. Casey. In that case, the Court once again established a woman’s right to choose. But, it changed the framework created in Roe. Instead of requiring states to regulate abortion based on trimester, the Court created a standard based on “fetal viability” – the fetus’s ability to survive outside the womb. Viability is usually placed at around seven months (28 weeks), but it can be as early as 24 weeks.

Coming back to the present, abortion is still legal in Texas, well only for about 2 weeks after a women misses her period which is the Senate Bill 8 driving a hard bargain because 85% of women seeking abortions are at least 6 weeks pregnant. In a bid to milk the Senate Bill, 12 other States have tried to ban abortion after six weeks, by trying to pass various scientifically unfounded ‘heartbeat’ laws. Most have been unsuccessful in their attempt because the precedent set by Roe v Wade, makes them unconstitutional.

Hope is still a radical idea for woman pregnant beyond the 6 weeks mark because the bill was framed placing the burden of enforcement entirely on private citizens, who are encouraged—to file lawsuits against anyone who performs an abortion after the six-week mark, or who “engages in conduct that aids and abets” an abortion, or who even “intends” to do such a thing. Plaintiffs do not need to know the person they file suit against, and, if they win, they are entitled, in most cases, to ten thousand dollars from the defendant and the reimbursement of their legal fees; defendants who win cases do not get their legal fees back. This bounty mechanism has made the bill immune to judicial interference, because there is no clear entity that can be sued in order to block the inhumane law.

Even pro-life Senators are thrown off by this idea of every citizen being able to tattle, sue an Uber driver to enforce the abortion law penalizing anyone who drives a woman to an abortion clinic after six weeks into a pregnancy. In response, the nation’s biggest rideshares, Uber and Lyft have announced that it is setting up a Drivers Legal Defense Fund to cover all legal fees for drivers sued under Senate Bill 8.

In a statement issued last week, Biden said he was directing the Office of the White House Counsel and his Gender Policy Council to involve the Health and Human Services Department and the Justice Department to evaluate what “legal tools we have to insulate women and providers from the impact of Texas’ bizarre scheme of outsourced enforcement to private parties.”

0 comments 28 views
7 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

By Pooja Bhattacharjee

Afghanistan, which was once a forward-thinking nation with so much potential, has now turned into a living nightmare. After the departure of the US forces from Afghanistan, the Taliban has taken control over most of Afghanistan in the last 1 week. Taliban’s rise to power in the nation means that the progress the nation had made in the last 20 years for democracy, girl’s education, women’s rights, and healthcare will be reversed. People will have to relive the harsh version of Islamic rule which persisted from 1996 to 2001. In the areas of the country where the Taliban have regained control, they have been executing people associated with government agencies, they have been lashing women, and shutting down schools. They have been blowing up hospitals and infrastructure. Many citizens are fleeing the nation, including the President of Afghanistan, Mr. Ashraf Ghani. Most of the countries including the US and UK have closed their embassy in Kabul and are evacuating their citizens.

Amid peace talks and negotiations with Taliban leaders and global outcry over the situation in Afghanistan, the most affected remain women & children. Previously, under the Taliban’s rule between 1996 and 2001, women could not work, girls were not allowed to attend school and women had to cover their faces and be accompanied by a male relative if they wanted to venture out of their homes. What is happening in Afghanistan is unimaginably terrible and this marks the destruction of everything Afghan citizens have tried to rebuild and work tirelessly for. Little girls who were brought up in an environment which nurtured their dreams of freedom and dignity are witnessing their future melting into the abyss in the Taliban regime. 

While the United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres urged the Taliban and all other parties to exercise the utmost restraint in order to protect lives and expressed particular concern about the future of women and girls in Afghanistan, the war crime on women is not likely to subside. Mehbooba Seraj, the Founder of Afghan Women’s Network has said, ‘What’s happening in Afghanistan today is going to put this country 200 years back.’ 

Afghan women working in journalism, healthcare & law enforcements have been killed in waves of attacks by the Taliban in the past few days. In the areas controlled by Taliban, women are being forced out of their jobs. Afghan women are now being told that they cannot leave their homes without a male escort (mahram), they cannot work, study or dress as they want. Although the Taliban officially state that they no longer oppose girl’s education, very few allow girls to attend school post puberty and many minor girls are being sexually enslaved in the pretext of ‘marriage’ to the Taliban militants. Taliban leaders who took control of the provinces of Badakhshan and Takhar issued an order to local religious leaders to provide them with a list of girls over the age of 15 and widows under the age of 45 for marriage with Taliban fighters.

While the whole of Afghanistan is experiencing this catastrophic tragedy, with every city collapsing, the hopes, dreams, and future of the country collapses. What started as a fight against terrorism has now become a fight against basic human rights and at this time of need, there is an urgent need for the world leaders and international bodies to intervene and assure a ceasefire between the parties involved. If quick measures aren’t taken, Afghanistan’s situation will worsen, and all the future generations will have to live in a regressive Taliban regime. 

0 comments 32 views
7 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Seeds of Thought:

Just 1 month and 10 days before her 13th birthday, on September 9th 2013, Rebecca Ann Sedwick, a 12 year old American student at Crystal Lake Middle School, Florida committed suicide by jumping off a concrete silo tower. Investigation into her death led to a conclusion of in-person and cyber bullying contributing to the decision to take her own life.

While the whole world discussed and debated her suicide and the impact of cyberbullying on adolescents, one young girl, Trisha Prabhu, decided not to remain a bystander and set out to fix the problem at its very roots. At 13, she didn’t have the resources or expertise on the subject to bring about change, but her passion kickstarted and ignited her journey towards that goal.

After returning from school one afternoon, Trisha Prabhu read about this horrifying incident and was deeply moved, shocked, and outraged. Heartbroken, Trisha wondered how a girl younger than herself, could be pushed to take her own life. She felt like something was going terribly wrong on the internet and wondered over and over, how the internet could allow such things to happen in the first place. The deep sense of pain she feels for Rebecca, can be felt in her voice as she begins her speech at a TedX event, where she cites the mean, hurtful and tormenting messages hurled by the cyber bullies at Rebecca Ann Sedwick, causing her to commit suicide – “Go Kill yourself”. “Why are you still alive?”. “You are so Ugly”.

Trisha began to wonder if adults even understood the gravity of the situation and if they were even willing to take charge and bring about the necessary change required to end this hate online. At that very moment Trisha decided that she wanted to do something to stop cyberbullying at the source before the damage is done. This led her to research on the subject which led to some startling revelations. Trisha realized that Rebecca was just one of a countless many who had endured the same pain and trauma. Megan Meier was a young teenager from Missouri who had her whole life ahead of her. Excited to join social media, she made a MySpace account, where she started receiving messages from a boy named “Josh”. Megan started receiving messages like, “The world would be a better place without you.” 3 weeks before her 14th birthday, Megan committed suicide.

Victims of Cyberbullying

Deeply moved by these stories she read about this silent pandemic of cyberbullying and being passionate to end online hate, Trisha created the patented technology product ReThink™, that detects and stops online hate at the source. What started as a school project eventually grew into a globally-acclaimed research. Thus, ReThink saw the day of light with Trisha as it’s CEO and Co-Founder.

ReThink:

Today, ReThink is an award-winning, innovative, non-intrusive, patented technology that effectively detects and stops online hate before the damage is done. More than just a technology, ReThink is a student-led movement too – It is a call-to-action, a push to end online hate and raise responsible citizens. The Artificial Intelligence powered ReThink is transforming lives and conquering cyberbullying. Latest data reveals that with ReThink, adolescents change their mind 93% of the time and decide not to post an offensive message.

At the time of publishing this article, ReThink has reached 1500+ schools, 500K+ downloads, 5 million+ students have been impacted, and 1.1 Million Ted Talk advocacy. It is available on your smartphone or tablet. It currently supports English, Spanish and Hindi. There is provision now to start a ReThink Chapter at your school as well.

How does ReThink work?

ReThink, an iPhone and Android app, installs a digital keyboard that replaces the standard smart phone keyboard. It appears identical and integrates seamlessly with other apps, like email clients and social media platforms. The only difference—it uses artificial intelligence to identify offensive words, and then deploys pop-up alerts to give the user a chance to reconsider sending those words in an email, text, or social media post. If you use the ReThink keyboard to insert phrases like, ‘I hate you’ or anything that goes in the territory of obscene or ignorant of someone’s feelings, the app prompts: “Hold on! Are you sure you want to say that?” or “Remember, you are what you type!” and gives you the option to either go ahead with the text or clear it.

Challenges:

While Trisha faced several obstacles while developing and launching the app, she faced greater challenges as a young woman of color (Indian immigrant) trying to run a tech company at such a young age. In an interview to the Vogue she says, “Everyone thought that I was really cute, but no one thought that I was serious, that I was committed to this idea and was going to be relentless about making it happen. I faced a lot of naysayers There were also several situations where I was on the phone with some very important people and they were really interested. But when I walked into the room, they were like, hold on, you’re a 16-year-old girl with no prior experience of the tech space. I had a lot of people who counted me out without really giving me a chance. Maybe that’s something a lot of women in the tech space experience, just being counted out without a chance to make their pitch. I had to work twice as hard and ensure my pitch was perfect so that there was never a reason to doubt anything that I was saying. It felt like there were times when there was a double standard. But in some ways, it was worth it because making change is more fun when you have something to prove. All the impact that we have been able to create today is a testament to the fact that I may have been cute, but I was also very serious.”

Achievements:

Thanks to her entrepreneurial spirit, Trisha has received world-wide acclaim in the business world. In 2016, President Obama and the U.S. State Department invited Trisha to the Global Entrepreneurship Summit, to showcase her work and share her story with other entrepreneurs. This led to ReThink being featured on ABC’s popular Television show, Shark Tank. In 2019, ReThink was the winner of Harvard University’s President’s Global Innovation Challenge & Harvard College’s i3 entrepreneurial Challenge. Trisha is the first ever Harvard College freshman to win the Harvard University’s President Innovation Grand Prize.

Trisha has also been honored with awards and recognition for her ingenuity in inventing, building, and launching ReThink. For her research and scientific inquiry, Trisha was named a 2014 Google Science Fair Global Finalist. She was awarded the 2016 MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) INSPIRE Aristotle Award, as well as the 2016 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois High School Innovator Award.

Trisha’s advocacy to put an end to hate, social activisim and commitment to find an ever lasting solution to cyber bullying, led her to be selected as the 2015 Global Teen Leader by “We are Family Foundation”. In 2016, she was conferred with the WebMD Health Hero of the Year Prodigy Award. She has also been conferred with Anti-Bullying Champion Award by the International Princess Diana Awards, the Global Anti-Bullying Hero Award from Auburn University, the Upstander Legacy Celebration Award from the Tyler Clementi Foundation, and Daily Points of Light Honor, awarded by the George H. W. Bush Foundation for extraordinary social volunteering and service.

Trisha’s vision and voice against online hate and the power of “ReThink” has been spread across the globe through her 38+ keynotes in 24 cities at platforms such as TED, TEDx, Wired, La Ciudad de Las Ideas, SAP, Girls Who Code, the Family Online Safety Institute, universities, schools, and more.

In 2017, she was elected Illinois’s Youth Governor – the first female YMCA Youth and Government youth governor in 28 years. During her free time she volunteers to teach young women how to code at ‘Girls who code’, or leading SoGal Boston, a chapter of the SoGal movement. Being an ardent supporter of empowering women in the entrepreneurial community, Trisha has been relentlessly working to inspire next generation entrepreneurs to fearlessly work in tackling pertinent issues plaguing the world.

Trisha is currently pursuing her undergraduate education at Harvard University in Cambridge, MA, USA. In one of her keynote speeches Trisha roars, “I am a Big dreamer and believe in making dreams come true.” We at ‘The Womb’ truly wish her the best and hope that her dream to build a better world by combating hate through technology come true.

Image Courtesy: Forbes

Video Courtesy: TeDx

Read more about Trisha Prabhu here:

https://www.trishaprabhu.com/

0 comments 29 views
12 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
The Womb - Encouraging, Empowering and Celebrating Women.

The Womb is an e-platform to bring together a community of people who are passionate about women rights and gender justice. It hopes to create space for women issues in the media which are oft neglected and mostly negative. For our boys and girls to grow up in a world where everyone has equal opportunity irrespective of gender, it is important to create this space for women issues and women stories, to offset the patriarchal tilt in our mainstream media and society.

@2025 – The Womb. All Rights Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Womb Team

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?