Tag:

women

The news was shared by Entrepreneur Extraordinaire Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw, the Executive Chairperson of Biocon Limited via Twitter congratulating her colleague Priyanka

26-year old Priyanka Mohite from Maharashtra has turned heads by becoming the first Indian woman to scale Mount Annapurna on April 16, 2021. Mount Annapurna, at a height of 8091 metres, is the world’s 10th Highest Peak. The mountain, surrounded by the Marshyangadi and Gandki glaciers, forms a part of Nepal’s Himalaya range. The Annapurna massif is 55 kilometers long and has gained notoriety for its long ridges, unpredictable weather conditions, avalanche-prone areas, and incredibly high fatality rate, thus making it one of the most challenging expeditions. 

Mohite, a Research Associate with Syngene International was lauded by her employer Ms. Mazumdar-Shaw, Executive Chairperson of Biocon via Twitter. Syngene is a publicly listed Biocon Subsidiary. Ms. Mazumdar-Shaw shared a picture of Motie with the Indian Tricolor and a congratulatory message, “Our colleague Priyanka Mohite scaled the peak of Mt. Annapurna, (8091 mtrs) 10th highest mountain in the world,  on 16th April 2021 at 1.30pm.- first Indian woman to do so!  We at @SyngeneIntl⁩ are so very proud of her”

Priyanka’s enthusiasm for mountaineering has been a significant part of her childhood too. She started to scale the Sahyadri range of Maharashtra as a teen. Mohite scaled the Bandarpunch massif of the Gharwal division of the Himalayas (Uttarakhand) in 2012. Later in 2015, she scaled Mount Menthosa at 6443 meters in the Lahaul and Spiti district of Himachal Pradesh. She has also achieved the distinct honour of being the third youngest Indian to climb the world’s highest peak Mount Everest at a height of 8,849 metres in 2013. She has also successfully completed expeditions on Mount Lhotse at 8,516 metres in 2018, Mount Makalu at 8,485 metres and also Mount Kilimanjaro at 5,895 metres in 2016. She was also awarded the Maharashtra state honour for adventure sports for 2017-2018. 

Image via LinkedIn/Priyanka Mohite

0 comments 37 views
6 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Saba Rajkotia

As the number of confirmed Coronavirus cases in India continue rising, Kerala, which had some early success in dealing with COVID cases, saw a steep rise in COVID cases with more and more people flying in the State. Kerala’s mortality rate still remains one of the lowest as the state has now tweaked its strategy to deal with COVID cases.

It’s important to note the role of Kerala’s Health and Social Welfare Minister, Ms. KK Shailaja, in efficiently dealing with the COVID challenge.

Since the first case of Coronavirus was reported in Wuhan, China, Shailaja has been keeping a close eye on the development and spread of the virus. Taking into consideration the fact that many students from Kerala travel regularly to Wuhan for their studies, the Minister ensured that the State was well-equipped to deal with the arrival of the virus. Quarantine facilities were prepared and medical aid and equipment was made readily available. Furthermore, the Minister ensured that decisions were made according to scientific reasoning, and with the advice of subject experts.

Over a month before Modi declared a nation-wide shutdown across India in response to the threat of Coronavirus, Kerala had already declared a State-wide Emergency – in the first week of February. Shailaja recognised the gravity of the situation, and ensured that the State took the threat seriously. All public events were cancelled, movie theatres and schools were shut down and more doctors were sought out and appointed. Now, as the whole country struggles to deal with the effects of the lockdown, Shailaja is ensuring school children don’t miss out on their afternoon meals by serving them in their homes.

Shailaja has been open about her lack of trained medical knowledge, and she makes a conscious effort to ensure her people are well informed about the progression of the virus through her social media account (@shailajateacher) and daily conversations with the press. Since coming into power in 2016, Shailaja has faced multiple tragedies alongside the people of Kerala. In 2018, Kerala dealt with the outbreak of the Nipah Virus, followed by devastating floods in both 2018 and 2019. In the face of all this adversity, Shailaja stood out as a capable, compassionate and effective leader who was able to lead her State out of crisis.

In the aftermath of the floods, Shailaja did her best to ensure easy access to food and medication for the underprivileged sections of society. In order to avoid the onset of water-borne diseases, the Minister brought in homeopathic and ayurvedic doctors and through her meticulous planning she successfully avoided further disasters for the people of Kerala.

Shailaja’s commendable track record in resolving public health issues and compassionate approach to crisis management make her a reliable leader for the people in Kerala. In these scary and uncertain times, Shailaja inspires confidence.

0 comments 39 views
2 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Ashmi Sheth

Arts& Culture, International

“Bringing people together, inspiring, soothing and sharing: these are the powers of art, the importance of which has been made emphatically obvious during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. With hundreds of thousands of people directly affected by the virus and billions more either in lockdown or battling the pandemic on the front lines, this World Art Day is a timely reminder that art has the power to unite and connect in times of crisis.”

— Audrey Azoulay, Director General of UNESCO

Every year, April 15, World Art Day is celebrated across the globe to promote the development, diffusion and enjoyment of art. This day was declared by the International Association of Art (IAA/AIAP), a partner of UNESCO to promote awareness of creative activity worldwide. Each year, World Art Day celebrations help strengthen the links between artistic creations and society, enhance awareness of the diversity in artistic expressions and highlight the contribution of artists toward sustainable development.

UNESCO encourages everyone to participate in the celebration through various activities such as debates, conferences, workshops, cultural events and presentations or exhibits. This year, the over 70 creatives and cultural professionals came together in the spirit to further Tanzania’s cultural and creative industries at an event organized by UNESCO, British Council and Make it Matter. The event aimed at celebrating the contribution of women in the creative sector. The panel discussion focused on how women as a collective play a catalytic role in transforming the creative sector and highlighted some of the achievements and challenges faced by women leading creative economy initiatives. Some of the challenges they mentioned include lack of management skills to run their enterprises sustainably, lack of adequate role models, lack of parental support compared to male counterparts, income and tax conditions and transition to digital technology. “Let us join hands in empowering women in the creative sector…” said Hon. Innocent Bashungwa, Minister for Information, Culture, Arts and Sports (UNESCO).

UNESCO underlined the need to promote gender equality in the culture and creative sector. UNESCO had published a special edition report on the state of gender equality in the cultural and creative sectors on International Women’s Day this year, in order to highlight the consequences of gender inequalities for the promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions. The year 2021 was declared the International Year of Creative Economy for Sustainable Development at the 74th United Nations General Assembly and The African Union declared the year 2021 as “The AU Year of Arts, Culture And Heritage: Levers for Building Africa We Want.” 

The UNESCO New Delhi Office for Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal and Sri Lanka also offered a special webinar to celebrate World Art Day on 15 April. The webinar featured a special discussion on the localisation of the 1980 UNESCO Recommendation Concerning the Status of the Artist and launched the UNESCO New Delhi Culture Sector campaign #UNESCOsupportsartists, designed within the framework of the UNESCO ResiliArt campaign. A number of Indian artists featured in the special campaign including Nandita Das, Indian actor and director and Geeta Chandra, Padma Shri awardee Indian classical dancer. 

April 15 also marks the Old Master, Leonardo da Vinci’s birthday, who was chosen as a symbol of world peace, freedom of expression, tolerance and brotherhood by the IAA. This year’s theme for World Art Day, “You’re Not Alone,” stresses the importance of promoting gender equality in the creative sector for a truly inclusive and prosperous economy to take shape. 

Know more about World Art Day and ResiliArt campaign at www.en.unesco.org.

0 comments 33 views
2 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

By Shikhar Gupta

In a recent report, it has been made very clear that the condition of women is extremely poor when it comes to protection against sexual offences. Almost every woman has faced the unpleasant experience of being stalked at least once in her life in India. It doesn’t matter at which stage you’re in your life, you might be a college student, a working professional, or a housewife, a huge number of women in India get stalked on a regular basis. The surprising fact is that most of the time, the perpetrators hang around in the neighborhood, outside offices, schools, or home etc. Due to the fear of being stalked, some women can’t even venture out alone in public.

However, with the advent of technology a new kind of stalking has come into existence where the stalker tries to constantly roam around the social media profiles of a woman. The online stalking is equally or sometimes even worse than the regular stalking because here the stalker has the access to the pictures and personal details of the woman and also has the power to download these pictures and misuse it for some inappropriate purposes, which can have severe consequences over a woman’s life.

 In India, stalking – physical or electronic via phone calls, text messages, or emails is a criminal offence. It is punishable with one to three years in jail. According to a report, “Whoever monitors the use by a person of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication that results in a fear of violence, or interferes with the mental peace of such person, commits the offence of stalking.” 

Under IPC, protection has been provided to women under Section 354, Section 354D for sexual harassment and Section 509 IPC for using words or gestures to insult the modesty of a woman. Under Section 354 of the IPC, whoever assaults a woman knowing that it would outrage her modesty is liable to be punished under the law. Also, Section 66-C, 66-D and 67 of IT act deals with cyber stalking for which complaint can be filed in any police station or Cyber Police in any city.

However, still some women choose to ignore their stalkers instead of approaching the police, the reason being that it is usually because they are intimidated by the thought of approaching the police or feel that the police will not help.

But do you know there is an alternate remedy available to this problem? 

Filing a complaint online! Women who are being stalked can complain to the National Commission for Women (NCW) and the Commission will take the matter up with the police. Any woman, in any part of India, can file this complaint. The Commission asks the police to then expedite the investigation. In serious cases, the commission forms an inquiry committee, which makes a spot inquiry, examines witnesses, collects evidence, etc. The Commission also has powers to summon the accused, the witnesses and police records, to facilitate the inquiry. For details, visit this website. If a woman is being stalked in Delhi, she can call 1096. For women in the rest of India, the NCW can be contacted by calling 0111-23219750.

0 comments 24 views
1 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Women In Our Country

by Elsa Joel

DR. ELSA LYCIAS JOEL

In our society, I hear a hypocritical outcry of deteriorating traditional values when a woman walks out of her marriage. But no one raises voice or limbs in support of the larger number of financially dependent women struggling in bad marriages without rushing to get divorced. Young and old professionals are more prone to and professional at calling off their marriages and only women continue to shoulder the blame. Divorce isn’t the flavour of any season. It happens not because women are uncultured, characterless or non religious but because they are educated, aware and have a strong sense of self-esteem. Institution of marriage will be respected minus incompatibility, temperamental differences and intolerance.
Societal and familial pressure or trepidation of being frowned upon cannot force a man and a woman to live together. Many divorces are filled with bitterness, hostility and rancor because men assume mud fighting and slander can hurt women in a reputation-conscious society. When women encounter problems in our society, tackling them calls for not loud voices, processions or placards but an objective analysis of reasons which underlie them. Not by law makers and enforcers but by every other woman and citizen who adorns different roles to women in their lives. 
We always find it too improper to mention the real cause of women subjugation, especially if its religion or scriptures. As a result, a culture of pseudo analysis and pseudo action becomes the norm. We have been seeing and hearing expressions like ‘women reservation bill’, ‘Nirbhaya fund’, ‘special woman safety programme’ and so on being bandied about as part of political debates and talk shows. Politicians, as we all have seen, heard and known are supposedly well-trained suitably qualified people who position themselves right at the centre of action with the explicit purpose of not putting anything into action and get away with anything in politics.
Countries which have been able to make some real, visible progress in women safety and empowerment are those whose leaders and citizens have been able to confront the problems head-on to find solutions. The government of Iceland has been funding UNIFEM (United Nations Development Fund  for Women) for the past three years to promote gender equality and Iceland stands number one on the list of safest countries for women. By almost every metric compared to the rest of the world, Denmark is very safe and it comes second. Denmark also has a history of finishing as the #1 happiest nation in the world according to statistics. Gender equality is important to the Nordic countries: Political parties in Sweden, Norway and Iceland all have gender quotas, which promote female candidates for top roles. As such, every country has their own ideals of equality between men and women. But if one understands equality as just a respectful treatment minus violence, abuse and harassment another, we can’t call it equality until there is a gender pay gap or glass ceiling.
Agreed, men and women are different biologically and psychologically. Women play certain roles better than men and vice versa to complement one another, be it home or work place. Never to prove one is dominant over the other.
In India, the governments that came and went dragged their everything on passing the women’s reservation Bill for a decade. Rape storms batter our country and #Metoo -a -day routine followed by the blow-by-blow breaking of news by the media calls for a closer and quicker look of where we stand as the victim rarely an opportunistic one or the assailant, many a time the one with money and muscle power. Guilt is presumed; innocence has to be proved beyond all reasonable doubt makes the concerned lie low and patient till they die or disappear. Worse still, rapists will brazenly continue raping unmindful of reprisals which they know how to handle and sometimes adorn seats in legislative assemblies and Parliament too. With such brats at the top, not just lofty things but even normal living for Bharath mathas and putris of all age groups become a dream. Seems like it’s not just ‘United we loot’ but ‘United we molest and rape’.
I hear desi folks scream, ‘increased divorce rates’. I’ve heard mothers and grandmothers warning girl children differently such as, “control your anger, you are a girl”. Such social conditioning of girl children in our society never needed any extra effort from anybody because religion is an important part of our country’s culture. And all religions profess and practice male dominance directly or indirectly. All over our spiritual India, women fast on sacred days to ensure their husbands’ longevity but there is nothing similar in the scriptures that expect a man to follow any ritual. In spite of these rituals, many studies and statistics show that women outlive men for reasons known to all. Still, women attempt these rituals out of fear because they know what widowhood means in a country like ours. Most religious traditions have subjugated women.
Sexism is intrinsic to Hinduism and Buddhism. The Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam have been worse. So much of howling and screaming is done against the objectification of women without realising thatnothing will change until scriptures are re-written.
Verse 2-213 of Manusmriti ‘ “Swabhav ev narinamiha dhooshnam…’ is translated as “It is the nature of women to seduce men in this world; for that reason the learned are never unguarded in the company of females”.
 Verse 5/151 when translated goes as this “Girls are supposed to be in the custody of their father when they are children, women must be under the custody of their husband when married and under the custody of her son as widows. In no circumstances is she allowed to assert herself independently”.
Manusmriti is in a way too primitive.
The Bible’s decree of male supremacy is known to the world. Most blessed mothers in the Bible are recorded to have given birth to sons only. Yes, a son as a firstborn is equated to a great blessing. The story of the adulteress who Jesus forgave and saved from being stoned is an example of how a combination of sex, a woman, public disgrace and double standard worked since biblical times. There was no mention of the man involved in the act. Without any mentioning the uphill battle remains steep for Muslim women. It is indisputable that women are excluded from Judaism’s most hallowed rituals and practices helping us understand that Judaism privileges are fundamentally male.
Sabarimala hullabaloo is a case in point. If discrimination to enter a temple is based on sexual orientation and caste , constitutional Articles related to freedom of religion and essential religious practices must be read to have a wider meaning to signal a new era of transformative constitutionalism. Freedom, rights and values embodied in our constitution should not be let to freeze in time. That would mean no possibility of positive change and progress to changing societal needs. Places of male gods cite menstruation as the main reason for denying women their religious freedom. How come theormative descriptive imagery and pronouns for god are male enabling people to sculpt them that way.
Being a Tamilian I pondered over ‘kallanalum kanavan pullanalum purushan’. It means even if the man is as insensitive as a stone or as useless as a blade of grass he is still ‘THE HUSBAND’, a visible god to the wife. Who else but a Male chauvinist must have uttered this proverb! And another insinuating comment from men goes as “Ellu na ennai ya vandu nikkanam” translated as  “Do more than what is expected of you” or  “going the extra mile” conveys the typical male attitude. Tamil literature has enough stories praising devout wives. Nothing wrong about it. But sometimes imaginations soar so high making stories sound ridiculous. One example is Vasuki Ammaiyar, a “Pathiviradhai” cooking delicious meal out a bag of sand given to her by Thiruvalluvar. Making such a story on a man of great intellect isn’t justifiable. And the pail that hung in mid air as this “Pathiviradhai” rushed to address her husband’s call half way through drawing water from a well is another story to motivate devotion in women.
Bharath Matha is one country where women are worshipped yet discriminated against and abused. It’s a national shame that despite more and more laws and funds, governments of secular, democratic and pluralistic India finds it difficult toensure that all sections of citizens feel equal, protected and secure. Were goddesses spared! Parvati created a boy to guard her doors from Shiva. Sita had to walk through fire to prove her loyalty. Unless mythologies are retold and understood in the right spirit, if not rewritten, these will be used to normalize or rationalize different forms of oppression or abuse, of course by the wrong people. 
Kathua,  Hathras, Unnao and many more can’t be forgotten, forgiven. Meanwhile, Rajvir Singh Pahalwan and Surendra Nath Singh ought to be educated on what amounts to rape. How does Surendra Nath Singh know that sanskar hasn’t been instilled in victims?  The Hathras district court was forced to stop the trial proceedings after Hari Sharma and his son Tarun Hari Sharma,  one of the advocates of the accused, created a hullabaloo and issued threats. But how was the father- son duo handled after their misbehavior is yet to be known. Being blessed with common sense, I guess, interrupting court proceedings by words and deeds should be considered as gross criminal contempt of Court.

0 comments 28 views
2 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Even after 70 years of its existence, the top court has not had a woman Chief Justice of India.

Lokendra Malik
First Published on Bar and Bench:
28 Mar, 2021 , 5:38 am

Though justice is usually portrayed as a woman, it has in general been embodied by men. The Supreme Court of India is also mainly a male-dominated institution. It has a strength of 34 judges, including the Chief Justice of India, but it has only one woman judge after the recent retirement of Justice Indu Malhotra.

There have been very few women judges in the Supreme Court up till now. Justice Fathima Beevi was the first woman judge of the Supreme Court of India, appointed in 1989. The second woman judge was Justice Sujata V Manohar, who was elevated to the Supreme Court in 1994. The third woman judge, Justice Ruma Pal, came to the Supreme Court in the year 2000. After her retirement, it was Justice Gyan Sudha Mishra who came to the Supreme Court in 2010. In 2011, Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai was appointed to the Supreme Court. Justice R Banumathi was elevated to the Supreme Court in 2014. Justices Indu Malhotra and Indira Banerjee, who will retire next year, came to the Supreme Court in 2018. All these women judges have made great contributions to the Indian judicial system by delivering judgments on a variety of significant issues relating to public, private law, and governance.

Even after 70 years of its existence, the top court has not had a woman Chief Justice of India. The reason is very simple. First, a lack of willpower on the part of judge-makers, and second, the formality of seniority convention plays a very significant role in making the Chief Justice of India. No lady judge reaches that zone of consideration because of the lack of seniority. For reaching the top position in the apex court, a judge needs a fairly long tenure of eight or nine years.

Only two times was this seniority convention breached – in 1973 and 1977 during the tenure of Prime Minister Mrs. Indira Gandhi – when junior judges were appointed to the office of the Chief Justice of India by superseding their seniors. The legal fraternity had rightly criticized such judicial supersessions. But thereafter, the seniority convention has been followed consistently in the appointment of the Chief Justice of India and there does not seem to be any apprehension of its dilution in the future as the Supreme Court has also approved this seniority convention in the Second Judges’ case in 1993.

The Supreme Court Collegium may consider elevating a woman judge who can have a tenure long enough to become the Chief Justice of India as per the seniority convention. This is a much-needed step toward the cause of women’s empowerment in the judiciary. Bypassing the seniority convention is neither possible nor desirable as judicial supersessions cause irreparable damage to judicial independence and give unwanted opportunity to the executive to control the judiciary. The timely appointment of woman judges so that they have long tenures is the best solution. And for this purpose, the Supreme Court collegium should take the initiative.

Post-1993, the judiciary has taken the power to appoint judges from the executive through constitutional interpretation, in the larger interests of judicial independence. Before 1993, the Prime Minister and the Union Law Minister were very powerful in making judicial appointments. They were the real judge-makers in the country. But now they have lost such influence. Under the existing practice, the judges of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President of India on the recommendation of the Supreme Court Collegium, which is headed by the Chief Justice of India and consists of four of his senior-most colleagues. This Collegium is the actual judge-maker and the President, Prime Minister, and the Union Law Minister have little say in judicial appointments.

However, the Central government has some scope to delay judicial appointments in some cases. The decisions of the Collegium are made by consensus. If two or more judges oppose the Chief Justice’s proposals, the Collegium cannot finalize the names and the President is also not bound to accept such recommendations. This exercise is done to eliminate the sole authority of the Chief Justice of India in judicial appointments. Now the CJI has to build a consensus among all his colleagues and finalize the names accordingly. He cannot ignore their views at all.

The President of India is bound to act as per the recommendation of the Collegium if it decides the names by consensus. However, the President, as aided and advised by the Prime Minister, has an option to return the recommendation of the Collegium once for its reconsideration. Thereafter, the President is bound to accept the Collegium’s recommendation if it reiterates its view. In other words, the Collegium has the final say in judicial appointments.

The present Supreme Court Collegium is headed by Chief Justice SA Bobde. Its other members are Justices NV Ramana, RF Nariman, UU Lalit, and AM Khanwilkar. As of now, the Supreme Court has four vacancies and five more judges will retire by the end of this year. Despite this, the Collegium headed by Chief Justice Bobde has not made even a single appointment to the Supreme Court. As per media reports, there is some deadlock in the Collegium, which has not reached a consensus on Chief Justices of High Courts who are eligible for elevation to the top court as per the seniority rule.

Chief Justice Bobde will retire next month. The last time a Chief Justice of India retired without recommending a single appointment to the Supreme Court was in 2015 (during the tenure of Chief Justice HL Dattu), when there was an unprecedented deadlock between the Central government and the judiciary on the issue of the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC). After Chief Justice Bobde’s retirement, Justice N V Ramana is likely to become the Chief Justice of India as per the order of seniority.

There is no dearth of brilliant women High Court judges and lawyers in the country. There are many brilliant women lawyers and judges who, if elevated soon to the top court, can become the Chief Justice of India after a few years as per the seniority rule. The biggest issue is to include them in the seniority circle so that they could come to the top after a few years. I think this is a great opportunity for the Collegium to give India its first woman Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. It is not a difficult task. It requires strong commitment to the cause of women’s empowerment in the judiciary.

In addition to this, the Supreme Court needs more women judges also. There should be at least four to five women judges in the Supreme Court. The Court decides many important issues which can be properly adjudicated with the help of a woman judge’s perspective. Some brilliant women lawyers can also be considered for the judgeship in the top court.

Justice Indu Malhotra is the first woman to be directly elevated from the Bar. This trend of making appointments from the Bar needs to be continued in the future also. Some brilliant legal academics can also be considered for judgeship in the Supreme Court, given the constitutional provision of appointments of ‘distinguished jurists’ to the top court.

When it comes to the question of appointment of judges to the Supreme Court from the High Courts, seniority and regional representation are the major criteria that the Collegium considers. But there have been instances where judges have been directly elevated to the Supreme Court by relaxing the seniority norm. It is not rocket science. If senior women judges are not available, there are no written rules that stop the Collegium from appointing a High Court judge or a practicing lawyer to the Supreme Court. Ultimately, the final choice of judges depends on consensus within the Collegium. If all the collegium members decide that it is time to recommend a woman judge’s name for the Supreme Court judgeship, they can do so and a woman judge can be appointed to the Supreme Court at this time.

So, all this depends on the will power of the Collegium, which has conclusive power in judicial appointments. There is no reason to assume that the Central government will not appreciate this idea, which promotes women’s empowerment. So, now the ball is in the Collegium’s court.

https://t.co/81X2xLvN0d
0 comments 22 views
3 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

A Woman Of Strength

by Guest Author

By PARWAAZ

A woman has died in me
A woman of disease with a lack of peace.
An animal who would toil and ask nothing
A dried leaf who would flutter and flinch.

A victim of sex, an object of jest
Who would only moan at her best.
A giver of life, a dutiful wife
For the treacherous world; alas! so naïve.

No, it’s not death, but a murder
A phoenix reborn, you could shudder.
A cool shade for you to rest
With all respect and no more jest.

A spring of love for you to thrive
Together we grow, take a long flight.
A place of trust and compassion, for you to fall apart
Together we are complete, and broken, when kept apart.

I am a woman of strength you can’t barge
I refuse to be dumb, I now take charge.
.

0 comments 25 views
2 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Crimes by humans against humans have become so mundane because a dishonourable idea had managed to survive throughout millennia. The idea has metastasized and exists among Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, Sikhs and Christians- more is the shame and the pity! That is, some people are inferior or even untouchable because of their low birth. This primitive idea plagues our country because we have failed to abolish it by law. 
Largest democracy in the world, probably one of the busiest judiciaries with million pending cases and a constitution shaped by some of India’s finest minds and drafted by a committee headed by B.R. Ambedkar – India finds it hard to form a cohesive national identity. Hailed as the best in the world and 30 times longer than America’s and still growing, only the intellectually honest can agree on the fact that the country’s progress is being held back because there is no unanimity of understanding on the set of rules. Ransacking the known constitutions is not difficult but taking valuable lessons is. After 73 years of Independence a vice known as discrimination, outlawed for over six decades, is resilient and exist in new and insidious forms.
Slavery abolition didn’t happen only because there existed a constitution. It became a reality because of political will power. For 18 years William Wilberforce introduced anti-slavery motions in parliament to realize his dream. ‘Honest Abe’ made sure his country became “The land of the free” in the real sense through the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1865. .
Abolition of Apartheid, a brutal and restrictive racial regime in South Africa took more than lives of revolutionaries, their all. Few anti-apartheid activists including teenagers succumbed to cruel and prolonged police torture and few were jailed and assassinated. Stories of heroes who were assaulted, blindfolded and given electric shocks for more than 2 months in detention gives us the creeps even today. While the apartheid state continued their cases against the defenseless and state-violence continued, the hero Nelson Mandela fought 40 long years. 27 years of imprisonment did not deter him from his long walk to freedom until he drew up a new non-racial and democratic Constitution for South Africa. Procedure for amendment of the Constitution and election of  members of Rajya Sabha of the Indian constitution were borrowed from the South African constitution. Since 1996, the South African Constitution has been amended by seventeen amendment acts and it is widely regarded as the most progressive Constitution in the world, with a Bill of Rights second to none. Of all the 104 amendments of the Constitution of India since it was first enacted in 1950, how many exist to guarantee equality and freedom to all citizens irrespective of their lineage? Rise of leaders like Chandrashekar Azad, Kanhaiya Kumar, Jignesh Mevani  and Hardik Patel is seen as an aggression- persecuting them into the bargain.
Not a year has passed ever since a 21 year old Jitendra was beaten up by a few beings and killed in “Devbhoomi”. The reason being nothing but Jitendra preferred to sit on a chair and have a meal like hundreds of others who attended the wedding. How ridiculous is this! More pitiable is the fact that not one among the hundreds were willing to testify what the crime was. Still, the incident was registered under the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 
The hate towards fellow humans who are branded different on the basis of an inhuman varna is so strong. Stories of humans being threatened, beaten up, lynched and killed on the basis of dharma-shastras are more than sufficient for the world to condemn and scoff at us. Forget the ‘Land of Gods’, in the ‘Land of Mahatma’ stones were hurled at a wedding procession by people who believe they are entitled to do anything while at Khambhisar village in Modasa taluka because the groom rode a horse. 
Despite the presence of police and their attempts to control the stone pelters, the victims had to run and hide. If Gandhiji is relevant today, why does Gujarat tops the list of states where certain people are subjected to systemic violence? Atrocities against the tormented and neglected lot in Gujarat have been rising steadily in the last two decades with the state witnessing a 72 percent increase in the number of registered cases between 2003 and 2018. Disturbing silences of those who are supposed to speak and act bother the citizens a lot.  A proactive role expected of the police leads to disappointments. Citizens are provoked. Is the epithet “The jewel of the west” unfairly awarded to Gujarat? A notable percent of India’s willful defaulters belonging to Gujarat provokes us to rethink if the state deserves the epithet. Better a flaw in a Jewel than no Jewel at all, isn’t it?  
Bhim Jayanti is a  day to reckon with. 129 years after his birth, Dr. BR Ambedkar’s tenets are still very relevant because India is home to 28% of world’s poor, the wealth of a handful is equal to the wealth of almost 600 million people, 30 million are trapped in quasi-slave labour paying off the ‘debts’ of their ancestors, 220 million are excluded from the mainstream society, 65% of health workers refuse to visit certain settlements thereby denying basic care to some of India’s most vulnerable people, cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment of over 165 million people in India is justified on the basis of their descent and above all the death of leaders who challenge the mindset of those who seek to maintain the status quo is very disturbing.  
Inspite of the available legal tools and affirmative action policies in India, police systematically fail to properly register these crimes under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 and the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1995.
Dr. BR Ambedkar is right. Casteism and Capitalism triggers everything that amount to the collapse of state institutions and a country’s downfall. Constitutional provisions prohibiting discrimination and the existence of legislation enacting these provisions will end crimes committed against humans on the basis of their “work and descent” only if Affirmative action policies in India are operative in three main spheres, namely appointment and promotion in government services, admission to public education institutions, and seats in the legislature. Graded inequality in ownership of country’s assets we see.  
Don’t we see governments allotting lands to Industrialists belonging to a privileged community, who in turn employ and play favourites to respective communities to make sure they are dominant and enjoy entrenched senior positions. 27 years on and the statistics prove that the OBCs have not optimally benefited from the supposed-to-be implemented Mandal Commission recommendations. Excuses are many and varied, but definitely not convincing. So, even with an administrative mechanism for regulating, monitoring and implementing the reservation policy certain communities continue to lag behind other segments of the Indian population which also means religious myths are used as a means to justify the privileges and rights enjoyed by a few at the cost of denying them to many others. 
Instead of attempting to criminalize peaceful social activism and engage in a pattern of repression to preserve the status quo, the government must address the social and cultural sources of exclusion, discrimination and violence. All repressed voices, be that of traditionally social and economic backward classes, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes or women, India needs to go a long way in bringing about true equality and justice as dreamt by Babasaheb Ambedkar.

0 comments 26 views
2 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

By Apurva Singh
Women politicians are supposed to wear traditional clothes to Parliament. Says who!? Is there a defined dress code to enter the Parliament? Hell no! Then what forbids a female politician from wearing jeans to the Parliament? The answer to this is the constant dress and moral policing done by the male politicians in the name of cultural preservation. 
While women in India, despite struggling through and overcoming the patriarchal hurdles of the society, fight to climb the ladder of success and power, it is the mentality of a few chauvinists who try to pull them down by belittling them on grounds that have nothing to do with their achievements or capabilities. 
No matter how strong an issue they put across, these female politicians cannot be dressed up in a western attire as sadly no one has to listen to what they have to say, the only thing everyone apparently focuses upon is the way they are dressing up because if a woman politician is wearing jeans or a western outfit to the Parliament or even in public she is jeopardizing and breaking the norms of the society and setting a bad example for the youth of the country. 
These female politicians are generally seen in elegant cotton starched sarees and quarter-sleeved blouses and if they dare to wear anything different then their character is not only questioned but assassinated by the male politicians who suffer from a disease called foot –in-the-mouth and having useless opinion disease. 
The fun part lies in the fact there is actually a list of best dressed female politicians on the internet, obviously not defined by vogue, which appreciates all female politicians for always being dressed up “traditionally”. Brinda Karat, Sushma Swaraj, Smriti Irani, Hema Malini are a few examples who are recognized for always dressing up ideally in public. But the point is will their voice not be heard if they dress up otherwise? Will wearing a western outfit undermine their capabilities and achievements? And the most important question being, who gets to decide that? 
When male politicians are not prohibited from wearing shirts and pants to the Parliament, why is it that  Mimi Chakraborty and Nusrat Jahan face massive trolling and scrutiny when they wear full sleeved shirts and trousers and jeans to the Parliament, which covered almost all of their body. There is no particular dresscode which forbids them to wear jeans or skirt to the Parliament then why the outrage? Aren’t these women elected to work as representatives of the public? Then why can’t they dress up as they desire and represent thousands of females of the country!? The fact is that as soon as these women start making sense and target the actual issues of the country, even in the most powerful institution that is the Parliament of India, they are personally attacked by lame criticism involving disgraceful remarks on the way they dress up. 
The problem lies in the fact that the male politicians are so used to compel these women politicians to wear sarees and not western clothes, is that, they forget the fact that ‘Saree’, which is supposedly the India’s national dress became popular with Indian women during the British rule which ultimately means that the concept of traditional modesty may not really have their roots in Indian tradition. 
Whether it is the President of Indian National Congress, Sonia Gandhi or Lok Sabha Member Mahua Moitra, irrespective of where they come from or what they have to offer to the society, they are appreciated only for their traditional dresses and that is where we need to re-think if India is really progressing or is it all just a sham!

0 comments 30 views
5 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

(My Journey From Being A Lawyer To A Tour Leader)

By Richa Shandilya

Everyone has been made for some particular work and the desire for that work has been put in every heart.

– Rumi

In 2017, I quit my job as a lawyer and decided to be a Tour Leader, much to the surprise of my friends and family. Most of them thought that just because I got bored with my monotonous life, I was trying to be different. What wasn’t clear to them then, and even perhaps me, was – what exactly made me switch between careers, especially those which are very different from each other – from law to travel. 

So, here I am, sharing my views on what made me switch my profession. This piece is motivated by the inner peace I am finding in doing this job, in the hope that it may resonate with some of you and propel you on your own path of inner peace.

I struggled for 28 years to find my inner calling, something that would fulfill my soul. At last, with some luck, I found it. It is travelling! Travelling has excited me as long as I remember. Travelling is a generic term and it involves many things. Every person has a different purpose behind pursuing travelling. For me, travelling is all about the thrill of journeys, meeting new people, understanding their perspective and exploring the world which is outside the box of my routine thinking process.  

Growing up in India, I felt the societal pressure to act in a manner where I do not break the norm of the society and try to ‘fit in’. I tried to convince myself that, travelling is the new trending activity which may be difficult to reach for everyone, and it was this initial perception of ‘being difficult’ that got me excited. 

I do think my childhood had a lot to do with what I am right now and my fascination with travelling. My father had a transferable job, and because of it I got the taste of travelling. Visiting places, which were very different from one another, gave me an exposure to different people, cultures, habits and landscapes. However the challenges that came with making new friends each time we changed the city came with mixed feelings. 

My first experience of travelling in childhood was when we had to shift to a small town in Uttar Pradesh from my home town – Patna. I was very excited because before that I had never travelled anywhere else outside Patna. As a child, the whole prospect of relocating to a new life, excited me beyond bounds. 

I was only 10 years old at the time and the whole excitement of travelling in train and going to a place where I knew nothing, never scared me. So it started, the thirst of travelling in me, and with each journey the thirst only increased and became more and more addictive with time. I changed 9 schools and travelled to 10 different states in India till I was 18 years old. I didn’t want to stop there. I wanted to travel more but I was in a stage where I had to choose my career and I still don’t’ know why – I chose Law. I don’t regret my decision to pursue law, because studying law has strengthened my confidence. However, the entire time that I was studying law and considering my career options, I always had a nagging feeling that I want to travel, undertake more journeys, and have stories to tell.  But I had no money to do that. I finished my degree and started working as a lawyer. Money started coming in but left me with no time to travel.  

So, the whole vicious cycle of trying to attain work-life balance, made me vulnerable and led to frustration. Everyday, going to work became a task, and justifying for myself the reason I was pursuing law, became increasingly difficult. But, you also need money to sustain your life and that’s how I landed being a Tour Leader for a world renowned tour company in India.

My journey of being a tour guide from a lawyer has been very interesting so far. I got to know, so many things about myself, which I would not have understood otherwise. This is because that’s what my soul was seeking, i.e. to continue my childhood fascination of taking different journeys, interacting with different personalities to understand the broader perspective of life.

In this series, from now on, I will be sharing with all of you my different experiences of my travels and share some stories along with some tips and techniques helping you undertake your own journeys. Perhaps travelling as a career us not what a lot of parents want for their kids unlike their dreams for their children to become a judge, or a top notch lawyer or crack UPSC. But it may open windows in the lives of many Indian women like me, who if given half a chance, would love to travel and make a career out of it.  

I am not quite a writer but, my purpose of starting series is to inspire Indian women out there, who have not been able to explore their desires, because of various reasons and urge them to rethink, about their lives and motivate them to pursue their destinies. Don’t be caught in a dilemma of thinking that you are being selfish, if you pursue your dreams. We women, can bring a bigger change in society, but it can only be done, when we explore our-self, move out of our comfort zone, see what’s out there and then choose – who we want to be. As we change the world, we change ourselves.

(Richa Shandilya is a tour leader who has also assisted government tours organized by Ministry of Foreign Affairs)

0 comments 26 views
6 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
The Womb - Encouraging, Empowering and Celebrating Women.

The Womb is an e-platform to bring together a community of people who are passionate about women rights and gender justice. It hopes to create space for women issues in the media which are oft neglected and mostly negative. For our boys and girls to grow up in a world where everyone has equal opportunity irrespective of gender, it is important to create this space for women issues and women stories, to offset the patriarchal tilt in our mainstream media and society.

@2025 – The Womb. All Rights Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Womb Team

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?